Re: a point is being missed
System Administrator (root@iifeak.swan.ac.uk)
Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:16:57 +0000
> whatever else they choose to do, but they could at least provide the means
> for others to easily replace these with static versions by the client's own
> discretion.
They could also provide a standard option so that you can pick between
1. All binaries ignore LD_*
2. All libraries on LD_* paths must be root or bin owned (id <100 etc)
3. Existing behaviour.
So you can lock down tight if you want. LD_LIBRARY path is great for development
but not always for other things.
Alan